Jointly addressing air pollution and climate change to reduce health-economic impacts


Jointly addressing air pollution and climate change to reduce health-economic impacts
Impact of cost–benefit assessment of air pollution on premature mortality (A) The annual premature mortality until 2050 in millions for the four types of policies considered (baseline, CBAP, TT, and TT+ CBAP) across all the SSPs. The Paris Agreement TT include both the 2°C and the 1·5°C targets in 2100, as described in the table. 2050 ranges are also highlighted. Points represent the median value. (B) The influence of the VSL to the CBAP scenarios (all SSPs) are shown in blue and the TT + CBAP scenarios are shown in gray. (C) The regional cumulative avoided premature mortality in SSP2 when internalizing air pollution benefits and costs for the 13 regions of the WITCH model. CBAP=cost–benefit assessment of air pollution. SSP=shared socioeconomic pathway. TT=temperature target. VSL=value per statistical life. WITCH=World Induced Technical Change Hybrid. Credit: DOI: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00259-X

Accounting for air pollution impacts reduces climate mitigation costs without increasing inequality and increases global and regional welfare. A comprehensive integrated assessment modeling framework capturing the most critical interactions between air pollution, climate mitigation and the economy, in the study led by RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment (EIEE) just published in The Lancet Planetary Health.

Climate change and air pollution are two major societal problems. Air pollution is responsible for millions of deaths worldwide and crop loss every year. Both climate change and air pollution share a common origin—fuel burning—and a common solution—a clean and fair energy transition. But which policy and technological interventions should be put in place, and when? Their complex interplay calls for an advanced evaluation framework that can support decision making. Previous assessments have looked at the co-benefits of climate policies for air pollution, but few have optimized air pollution benefits.

The study lays out a modeling framework that internalizes the economic impacts of air pollution on human mortality, while considering climate constraints and aerosol feedback. Results show how welfare-maximizing strategies accounting for air pollution benefits generate considerable health benefits, avoiding 1.62 million of annual premature deaths by mid-century, a figure that is three times greater than the co-benefits of climate policies.

“This study develops and implements a benefit-cost, integrated air quality-climate modeling framework,” explains Lara Aleluia Reis, researcher at RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment (EIEE) and lead author of the study. “We highlight how health benefits of optimized air pollution interventions are greater than climate mitigation co-benefits alone, and in case of delayed climate action are essential to keep mortality at lower levels. Air pollution reductions are mainly achieved via end-of-pipe technologies (EOP), especially at the beginning of the century and when no climate policy is in place. This result speaks to the importance of EOP measures in the first half of the century. This is the first global study to optimize structural and end-of-pipe investments to mitigate air pollution and to simultaneously attain the Paris Agreement temperature objectives of 1.5 and 2°C.”

The researchers proposed a comprehensive optimisation modeling framework that internalizes the air pollution impacts on human mortality into the optimization of climate policies and accounts for the aerosol reductions from the air pollution policies. They analyzed a vast set of scenarios that have different air pollution control baselines, several assumptions about how to economically value health, and how deep and fast international climate policies will unfold, allowing them to deal with uncertainties about their assumptions and to identify robust conclusions.

The results of the study therefore provide evidence of the need to jointly address air pollution and climate change. Air quality controls are needed even if ambitious decarbonization policies are in place. “Air pollution strategies that save lives do not jeopardize the fight against climate change. On the contrary, we find that global and regional welfare increases when air pollution impacts are internalized, with no negative repercussions on global inequality. Designing economically integrated policies that simultaneously generate cleaner air and less global warming increases global well-being: it also facilitates the political economy of a sustainable energy transformation in key emitting regions,” Lara Aleluia Reis concludes.


Net zero-emission pathways for reducing environmental risks and the economy of climate change


More information:
Lara Aleluia Reis et al, Internalising health-economic impacts of air pollution into climate policy: a global modelling study, The Lancet Planetary Health (2022). DOI: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00259-X

Provided by
CMCC Foundation – Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change

Citation:
Jointly addressing air pollution and climate change to reduce health-economic impacts (2022, January 6)
retrieved 7 January 2022
from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022-01-jointly-air-pollution-climate-health-economic.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.





Source link

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Natural Wellness Gifts
Logo
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Compare
0
%d bloggers like this:
Shopping cart